Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementations

[DougEwell2]

In a message dated 2001-09-24 22:12:50 Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> I don't see why this is an issue at all. Any two letters could mean
> something somewhere to someone. The fact that they happen to be country
> codes should be irrelevant.

I was going strictly by Robert's assumption that ISO 3166-1 codes were 
considered something to avoid.  If there is no harm in using them, then there 
is no harm in using them; but if there is (or if someone thinks there is), 
then the "good" codes are AA, QM to QZ, XA to XZ, and ZZ.

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California