> I disagree Unicode Consortium to the WG dated 02Sept > recommendation. > > Unicode has been very effective to collect scripts and glyphs > of all scripts, and even comes up with Unified CJK character > set, which is essential for IDN implementation. I call this > the FIRST level of look-alike equivalence.
Unicode does not collect glyphs but characters (and cf. section 2.1 of UTR #17, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/). This is a fundamental property of the Unicode standard. I am everything but a CJK expert, but along the same idea, the Han characters were unified because they meant the same thing (semantics) not because of glyph similarities. YA
