Note: Until the I-D is published, reviewed and accepted into wg pool, the wg have to proceed as if this activity does not happened.
The wg cannot wait or delay its schedule waiting for non-wg activities. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "Soobok Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update As one of the participants, I guess one of the drafts will come out late october or early november. Soobok ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update > Thank you for telling me this, could you please > update me, where they are? When do I expect > to see the draft? > > Liana > > > On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:05:57 +0900 "Soobok Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > CJK participants are working hard offline to prepare drafts for > > new solution > > for TC/SC/Kanji equivalence within IDNA architecture . > > > > Please take this into consideration before making further progress > > on your own. > > Thanks > > > > Soobok > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:23 PM > > Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update > > > > > > > You are correct on what you have said here. But > > > what I have said is correct too. TC/SC mapping > > > are examples of semantic equivalence and > > > Unicode has not deal with them. > > > > > > So do some TC/SC equivalence in Kanji. > > > > > > Liana > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 19:52:11 -0700 Yves Arrouye > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > writes: > > > > > I disagree Unicode Consortium to the WG dated 02Sept > > > > > recommendation. > > > > > > > > > > Unicode has been very effective to collect scripts and glyphs > > > > > of all scripts, and even comes up with Unified CJK character > > > > > set, which is essential for IDN implementation. I call this > > > > > the FIRST level of look-alike equivalence. > > > > > > > > Unicode does not collect glyphs but characters (and cf. section > > 2.1 > > > > of UTR > > > > #17, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/). This is a > > > > fundamental > > > > property of the Unicode standard. I am everything but a CJK > > expert, > > > > but > > > > along the same idea, the Han characters were unified because > > they > > > > meant the > > > > same thing (semantics) not because of glyph similarities. > > > > > > > > YA > > > > > > > > > > > >
