On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > The DKIM aggregate reports show whether a server signs correctly all >> mails or >> > not. If the aggregate reports show that this is sometimes (let's say >> in 1%) >> > not done correctly, the signer has no way to find for which email the >> signing >> > has not worked and cannot fix the signing software, unless a report for >> the >> > failing mail is sent with r=y. >> >> Well, nope. Aggregate reports belong to DMARC. Consider adding a rua= >> address >> to your DMARC record. Sometimes aggregate reports allow a postmaster to >> pin >> which message triggered it. If you also set a ruf= address, you might >> receive >> ARF reports as well. >> > > +1. > Actually, Dilyan is correct; RFC6651 introduced a reporting stream independent of DMARC. I've no data about how widely it's used outside of OpenDKIM, however, but it's not strictly a DMARC or ARC mechanism. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
