Hello, I suggested to write in ARC to alter the existing signature.
Anyway, propose handling on which there will be consensus. Regards Дилян On August 18, 2018 9:20:08 PM PDT, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Dilyan Palauzov ><[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Two out of two responders were against removing r=y from the >> DKIM-Signature. >> >> I am fine with removing the invalidated DKIM-Signatures, but mailman >> developers are not (https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/500) as >> this were incompable with ARC. >> >> What about writing in ARC, which I have not read, to remove r=y, >before >> handling DKIM-Signature:s? >> > >Do you mean for ARC to ignore "r=y"? > >Otherwise, isn't this again altering an existing signature, which >consensus >(so far) disagrees with? > >-MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
