On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Dilyan Palauzov <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suggest here in to suggest in a more formal manner, that MLMs modifying > a message are supposed to remove the r=y part of just invalidated > DKIM-Signature and this logic is also applied for ARC, if relevant (I don't > know ARC). Fixing only ARC will not help, as there is software that > follows DKIM, but has no idea about ARC. > > Is such a recommendation a good idea? > > How to make the recomentation? Amendment to RFC6377, amendment to RFC > 6651, something else, that is very short to compose? > I think advising anyone to alter a signature on a message irrespective of the signature's validity will be hard to sell. It would be simpler to just remove the signature entirely if there's a good reason not to want it there anymore. This unfortunately seems a rather small thing for which to spin up an update to either RFC6377 or RFC6651. Are there any other things that have evolved since those documents were published that might make revisions worth doing? -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
