> On Nov 12, 2022, at 8:32 AM, Roland Turner
> <roland=40rolandturner....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 11/11/22 23:09, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>
>>
>> More concerning to me: The IETF has previously taken the position that the
>> market will figure out spam and phishing, and therefore consideration of
>> protocol solutions should be deflected. DMARC was the result. I feel that
>> we leave this to the market, and that industry, at our own peril. I think
>> we should give this a serious look before rejecting it outright.
> Are you able to state concisely why DMARC was a harmful outcome, assuming
> that's your intended meaning ("peril")? From my admittedly somewhat
> bystanderish perspective, DMARC looked like a great success, particularly
> after IETF repeatedly failing for more than a decade[1].
>
I would give my opinion, but that’s off-topic for discussions of the replay
problem.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
