On 8/4/2023 11:51 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
I was referring to draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc-07, not what is mentioned in the subject line. It refers to RFC 8617 which is experimental, although it lists it as an informative rather than a normative reference which I think is incorrect.
You think there is a problem with having a nascent draft specification refer to -- or even rely on -- a published, experimental specification? Really?
I don't recall that being a problem historically nor against any IETF policies, rules, or the like? Perhaps you can elaborate on your concerns and the historical basis for them?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net mast:@[email protected] _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
