On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, for starters ARC doesn't have broad deployment. But the author > doesn't say why ARC is needed or relevant. That is the point here. *All* > changes need to be justified including any imported mechanisms. The less > rat holes the better. Same with the mailing list modification draft. Why is > that even relevant? > With respect to ARC: There's a difference between asking for justification and demanding that the discussion be stopped before it even starts. One of those is not okay. With respect to the MLM draft: Since this is the only IETF list that covers DKIM specifically, that makes it a reasonable venue for raising DKIM-related ideas that might exceed the charter. I would agree that this WG shouldn't take up any DKIM topics not related to the replay problem, but I don't see an issue with announcing in this venue that you have an idea and invite discussion off-list or in some other venue for as long as this list is allocated to an active working group. -MSK, ART AD
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
