Emanuel Schorsch wrote in <cafcyr_ubfe58xecaakyzg7tbd5qdmdb_wyxeojjtfjd86rv...@mail.gmail.com>: |I don't have a strong horse in this race. But I'll just chime in that from |my perspective I was thinking of both of these as DKIM Replay. I have been |calling any case where the DKIM signature is not broken and the spammer |resends multiple copies as DKIM Replay.
I also not, but if i insist on the "sealing" that RFC 6376 describes then a solution for the one you describe was created alongside the standard as such? --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
