On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:50 AM Wei Chuang <weihaw= [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 This version looks good. My only minor quibble is that the timeline > is aggressive, but as noted elsewhere, it sounds like this can be updated > later. > The timeline is largely fabricated, created around the v1 charter and not yet updated. I'm concerned more with content and sequence at the moment, not dates. I've started the IESG review process. There will be two review rounds (internal and external), so there's still time to fold feedback in. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
