On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:01 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 2:51 PM Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There are many things Dave and I might disagree on but this is not one of
>> those things. I wholeheartedly agree with Dave that a name change is
>> appropriate and necessary. The sooner the better.
>>
>
> I think I asked this during chartering and even offered up a couple of
> alternatives during and since, but nothing has stuck, so I'll ask again:
>
> Does anyone want to put forward a suggestion?  Without one that sticks,
> people are just going to keep calling it DKIM2.
>
> -MSK considering
>

As long as we are into recycling names, we could always call it SenderID.

Michael Hammer.
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to