It appears that William Weiner <[email protected]> said: >Receiver ADMDs SHOULD NOT treat a message bearing a single valid DKIM2 >originator signature as suspicious solely because no prior chain is >present and the message carries threading markers (References, In-Reply-To). >Threading markers without a prior chain is the expected and >legitimate output of a re-originating intermediary (see Section 5.x). A valid >single-hop DKIM2 signature from a re-originating service should >be evaluated on the same basis as any other Sender ADMD originator signature.
I'm with Richard. From the recipient's point of view your mail is no different from any other mail that happens to be a reply to another message, so there's nothing interesting to say here. Also, re-originating services are very far out on the long tail and while there is nothing wrong with them, it's not reasonable to ask people to do anything special for them. Fortunately, there's no need to do so. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
