Hi!
On 7/13/26 18:26, William Weiner wrote:
[...]
The ask is one sentence in Section 6: a valid single-hop DKIM2 signature from a
re-originating service with documented characteristics (p=reject, functioning
abuse contact, stable domain reputation) SHOULD be evaluated on the same basis
as any other Sender ADMD originator, without prejudice for the absence of a
prior chain.
How would a recipient identify your service as a "re-originating
service" as distinct from other services anyway, if it signs i=1? I'd
think at least in terms of DKIM2 such a "re-originating service"
wouldn't look different from an "originally-originating service" (or
whatever we call the relevant complement set).
Hannah.
--
Hannah Stern
Software Developer
Mail Transfer Development
1&1 Mail & Media Development & Technology GmbH | | |
Phone: +49 721 91374-4519
E-Mail:[email protected] | Web:www.mail-and-media.com www.gmx.net www.web.de www.mail.com www.united-internet-media.de
Hauptsitz Montabaur, Amtsgericht Montabaur, HRB 5452
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Charles, Dr. Michael Hagenau, Thomas Ludwig, Dr.
Verena Patzelt
Member of United Internet
Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder gesetzlich geschützte Informationen
enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, unterrichten Sie bitte den Absender und vernichten
Sie diese E-Mail. Anderen als dem bestimmungsgemäßen Adressaten ist untersagt,
diese E-Mail zu speichern, weiterzuleiten oder ihren Inhalt auf welche Weise
auch immer zu verwenden.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that saving,
distribution or use of the content of this e-mail in any way is prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the
e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
