> >> delivery filtering process. So the nature of the 'accountability' is
> >> inherently narrow.
> >
> >I thought the primary role was to authenticate an identity.
> Right. The identity of the accountable party.
> >Any "accountability" should be explicitly defined.
> Good lord, no. The recipient might do anything from whitelist a domain to
> blacklist it to filing suit under a local anti-spam law. It would be the
> height of hubris and foolishness to try to dictate that.
Exactly. These sorts of squishy, ill-defined semantic assignment problems are
the places we dare not go.
Ned
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org