John Levine wrote:
> Our lives would be simpler if everyone would mail only in
> ways that matched our favorite simple security model
Sure, but where some practice is far beyond anything found
in an RfC it's okay to say "broken".
> disparaging real mail sent in inconvenient ways as "forging"
> isn't going to make that happen.
Foul-ups in what I consider as "user territory" like the body
(content), Message-ID, From, Sender, Reply-To, Subject, Date,
and any Resent-zoo are a bit more than only "inconvenient".
I'd have no problem with s/forgery/broken/, but "inconvenient"
is way too weak.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
