On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Eliot Lear allegedly wrote: > Mark Delany wrote: > > Given the religion, I wonder whether both are entirely reasonable and > > leave the choice to the particular list implementor. > > > > I know I don't want to take on the argument of which is reasonable so > applying guidance for both and for clients in the face of both is > important. Particularly for whether or not you protect the Subject line > and how at all to limit length, and or resign. There are some serious > UI issues there.
The very early thinking back at DK-00 was that a participating list might sign List-ID. The idea being that List traffic is distinctly different and that a verifier/UA might sensibly treat such traffic differently in the presence of a List-ID. Subsequent revisions went down the path of generalizing that to Sender. In retrospect, I'm not sure I'm a fan of that generalization as List traffic is so different that it need not be squeezed into a generalized category that otherwise is almost completely absent in real-life traffic. Mark. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
