On 8 Sep 2006 16:48:41 -0000 John Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>2. I don't care about the breakage and I'd prefer you reject unsigned mail. > >Not to put too fine a point on it, but the fundamental question here >is why should the recipient care what the sender claims he prefers? > >Anytime you send e-mail to someone, you're basically asking them to do >you a large favor by investing the effort to accept and deliver it. >Senders don't get to set rules about what recipients can do. > >It's fine if senders can offer advice to recipients that the >recipients find useful to do what they want to do, which is presumably >to deliver mail that their own users want, but "because I said so" >doesn't make advice useful. > OK.
Is there a formulation for this kind of 'strict' policy/practice/whatever that you wouldn't find innappropriate? Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
