On Friday 08 September 2006 16:09, John L wrote: > One of the most useful outcomes of SPF was the confirmation that people > are generally unable to get any but the most trivial configuration > descriptions correct. An SPF record consisting only of -all is probably > correct, while an SPF record consisting of something else followed by -all > is almost certainly wrong. All of the proposed SSP values other than "I > send no mail" fall into the latter category. > I'd be interested in the data that supports this assertion.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
