On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Michael Thomas:
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
10. The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a
valid first party signature is found.
Hector, doesn_t it say exactly what you want it to say? It says
that the protocol must not require invocation when valid first
party signatures are found. It doesn't say "THOU SHALT NOT INVOKE
THE PROTOCOL". I see nothing that needs to be changed.
Exactly.
I agree.
Are these policies to be used in only one protocol, or might there be
multiple protocols that make use of these policy records?
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
