On Sep 26, 2006, at 3:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The protocol we are discussing is DKIM, although another protocol
might find SSP useful it's out of scope for this discussion.
Agreed. The policy being discussed relates to the handling of
messages associated with DKIM. There could be protocols defining the
handling at the MUA, versus protocols that define handling at the
MTA. Two message/policy protocols based upon DKIM messages at
different stages of delivery. These are significantly different
environments with different limitations. At the MTA, it seems
reasonable to limit when a policy record is required. At the MUA,
different requirements apply when a message is being annotated.
Without annotation, DKIM provides virtually no protection.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
