On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
I can't comprehend the relevance of your words since we're not
dealing on the level of "local-part" in this WG - only on the level
of "domain". Isn't this true?
This prior and current version of SSP by Eric both include local-part
policy components. As these components are essential when attempting
to constrain various annotations, it seems only logical to consider
how this element is best incorporated. To ignore the local-part seem
like designing a house where the doors are all too small to
accommodate furniture.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
