In other words, would folks prefer to:
A. Expedite publishing the Overview documents, in order to facilitate
development and deployment of the -base specification (with an update
later on for SSP), or
B. Defer the Overview document until the SSP specification is complete.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Hansen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>
>> Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Message
>> Signing Service Overview
>
> As you read through this, you will find that the stuff in it dealing
> with SSP is only part way there. This is hardly unsuprising since SSP
> itself is only part where there.
>
> An outstanding issue from the last IETF was (quoting the minutes):
>
> Tony Hansen reviewed the status of the DKIM Overview document,
> and we got another "hum" from the room about preference to put
> the document out soon, to aid implementations of the DKIM base,
> with a possible second version later, covering subsequent
> topics... or to publish the overview document only after the
> working group completes (or largely completes) the rest of its
> work. The consensus was again not overwhelming, and was
> marginally in favour of publishing a first version now.
>
> Given the lukewarm consensus before about publishing this document now
> versus later, we didn't push hard one way or the other for the latest
> update.
>
> However, I'd like to hear some discussion on the issue: Should we put
> out a version now (without the SSP references), or hold off until SSP is
> totally finished?
>
> Tony Hansen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
