On 3/14/07 8:01 AM, "Michael Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled:
> Powers, Jot wrote: >> On 3/12/07 5:43 AM, "Tony Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled: >> >>> In other words, would folks prefer to: >>> >>> A. Expedite publishing the Overview documents, in order to facilitate >>> development and deployment of the -base specification (with an update >>> later on for SSP), or >> >> +1 >> >>> B. Defer the Overview document until the SSP specification is complete. >> >> As the largest phishing target out there, we're interested in having DKIM be >> out there as soon as possible, without waiting for SSP, because even "fast" >> for the IETF process isn't particularly speedy, whereas spammers and >> phishers are. > > Not to pick on Jot, but this is very illustrative of why putting > -overview in the path right now may be very counter-productive. > -Base *is* done. Waiting for -overview is *not* required. The > best possible wait time is the zero you can do by reading -base > right now and deploying it. Don't worry, I can take it. :) I almost wrote: C: Wait for nothing. But I was trying to be a good little list member and only vote on the options provided. Just to be clear: We would DKIM sign now (and did a while ago) if our appliance vendor supported DKIM, which they plan on doing, once it is a "standard" for some value of "standard". (They have said summer '07) Our approach is that we don't care about chicken's or eggs, we just love a nice chicken omlete. :) -Jot -- Jot Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: 480-862-7234 Cell: 480-221-1157 Skype: jotebay _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
