Eric Allman wrote:
--On March 12, 2007 8:43:58 AM -0400 Tony Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In other words, would folks prefer to:
A. Expedite publishing the Overview documents, in order to
facilitate development and deployment of the -base specification
(with an update later on for SSP), or
B. Defer the Overview document until the SSP specification is
complete.
B. But I think I'm going against the flow.
+1. I'd like to focus on SSP, but wouldn't rule out a draft (which
wouldn't be published as an RFC) that contains deployment guidance in
the interim.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
