Hi all, We need to give Pasi guidance on the WG's opinion of the various errata [1] that've been posted for RFC 4871.
Most of these were generated as a result of the good interop work done earlier, so this should hopefully be easy. We need to tell Pasi if we think the errata as posted should be accepted and if so, whether the proposed change and accompanying notes are ok or not. If the text needs changing then we need to generate the new text required. (Since this could take some time, please don't try to e.g. polish the notes text so that its totally nice and shiny:-) If there are ones we need to discuss, please start a new thread for each. Once that's settled down, I'll send out a mail looking for some +1's on the entire set. (If no-one comments on any of them in two weeks, i.e. by 2008-10-13, then I'll send out that message anyway.) After that's all done, we'll want to think about whether to do a 4871bis with the changes or a delta or whatever, but that's for later. Thanks, Stephen. [1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4871&eid= _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
