Pasi's note today prompted me to look back at his previous note on the
errata. And what do you know, I already had it marked "I need to respond
to this". :-) Better late than never.
Look for the response separately.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In particular, my earlier email (two months ago) identified
> two errata (1383 and 1378) that deserve a closer look:
>
> http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q3/010664.html
>
> (For these two, I'd be hesitant to assume that silence
> means everyone's OK with them.)
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext
>> Stephen Farrell
>> Sent: 29 September, 2008 12:44
>> To: ietf-dkim
>> Subject: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We need to give Pasi guidance on the WG's opinion of the
>> various errata [1] that've been posted for RFC 4871.
>>
>> Most of these were generated as a result of the good interop
>> work done earlier, so this should hopefully be easy.
>>
>> We need to tell Pasi if we think the errata as posted
>> should be accepted and if so, whether the proposed
>> change and accompanying notes are ok or not. If the
>> text needs changing then we need to generate the new
>> text required. (Since this could take some time, please
>> don't try to e.g. polish the notes text so that its
>> totally nice and shiny:-)
>>
>> If there are ones we need to discuss, please start
>> a new thread for each. Once that's settled down, I'll
>> send out a mail looking for some +1's on the entire set.
>> (If no-one comments on any of them in two weeks, i.e.
>> by 2008-10-13, then I'll send out that message
>> anyway.)
>>
>> After that's all done, we'll want to think about whether
>> to do a 4871bis with the changes or a delta or whatever,
>> but that's for later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen.
>>
>> [1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4871&eid=
>> _______________________________________________
>> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
>> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
