On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 10:43 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Hi all, > > We need to give Pasi guidance on the WG's opinion of the > various errata [1] that've been posted for RFC 4871.
I agree with the proposed changes. I do find it interesting that the interop event hasn't happened yet. :) -- Jeff Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> e-Dialog _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
