> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John L
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Next steps for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp
> 
> 
> >>> 4) Minor clarifications/nits
> >
> > I think clearly explaining when an organization that signs all
> > its outgoing email can actually publish a "dkim=all" policy is
pretty
> > important --  although ADSP doesn't (and shouldn't) do everything,
> > we need to be clear about what it does.
> 
> It's when the signature matches the From: address.  Shouldn't be too
hard
> to say it again.
> 

Wouldn't the better (correct) way to state this be: 

It's when the signing domain (d=) and signature matches the From:
address domain.


Mike


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to