On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 07:34:53PM -0500, J D Falk wrote: > On 30/12/2008 11:15, "Dave CROCKER" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The fact that i= is defined to identify a user, rather than a mailbox, > and > > A user, or a use! But I doubt that makes things any clearer.
I thought i= was just an identity. It could have any of these properties: 1) is a valid domain when it is the same as d= 2) could be a sub-domain of d= and might not even exist 3) could look like an address/mailbox (with 1 & 2) but that mailbox doesn't have to exist So it should be treated opaquely as it could really represent anything. -- Jeff Macdonald [email protected] _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
