>> That would be fine with me, but what it says now is that the i= MUST match >> the From: address. As I've said a few times, that's clearly wrong, but I >> got shouted down in the past when I tried to change it. > > Without getting into the merits of the argument (and I don't think we > should do all that again), the document does currently reflect the > WG's rough consensus so let's keep this to adding clarifications as > Pasi requested and not try re-open issues now after the end of IETF > LC.
Since I don't understand what the people who want to use i= think it's supposed to do, I'll defer to the other authors and them them fix it this time around. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
