On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:09:29 -0800 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > >but, ummm..., this really would be a functional enhancement, and so it ought to >be discussed as part of the broader RFC revision effort, and certainly under a >different thread, such as the Subject I'm using here... > Could we please let the ink dry on the one we have first?
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
