On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > Now let's see if we can clarify once and for all that d= is the > identifier, and i= only means what the signer wants it to mean, so you > can only interpret it to the extent you recognize the signer.
Good. Can the errata document that seeks to clarify SDID v/s UAID please, please drive this point home? With enough MUST NOT BE ASSUMED type wording? -srs _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
