Michael Adkins wrote: > There isn't. We host mail for numerous domains, but we're planning to > sign all of it as d=assessment.aol.com for the reasons Suresh mentioned > (same use policies, filtering, etc.). Plus, a single user identity in my > system can have multiple email addresses associated with it, so it makes > more sense (in my mind at least) to set [email protected] > instead of [email protected]. For example, a single > dial-up customer can have up to seven mailboxes at a time but there's > still only one responsible identity for the account. I believe broadband > access providers have similar setups.
Aha! That's a sending-side use case that's clearly different from the receive-side use cases I listed yesterday. That kind of signing would prevent using i= for social networking, because even if Grandma pays for the account (and thus the user_id roughly identifies her), drunken Uncle Ernie lives in the basement and sponges off her AOL subscription, and they'd both have the same i= value. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
