On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jeff Macdonald <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd still think even given that model, you'd let the actions of the i= > determine the trustworthness of the steam independent of what the owner > of d= claims.
Always crosscheck, is a good general rule. But let's put it this way .. if I trust you enough to even look at your i= (let alone engage in the contortions of d= and i= permutations and combinations that ADSP would require) then I dont need to keep more than a general eye on your mail stream. Especially as I know its backed by a feedback loop where you will be alerted about issues and deal with them (we at outblaze tie our loop to a strong whitelist, and you cant get a loop unless we whitelist you .. so we have been using that reputation model early on). -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
