Dave CROCKER wrote: > If I'm understanding the exchange you two are having, I think it means > suggesting two changes to the draft Errata: > > 1. For 10 and 11, change UAID to be SDID. > > 2. Add text about the use of i= stating that it's use for assessment goes > beyond using d= and is MUST be based on additional knowledge of its creation > that is outside the specification. > > Does this reflect what you two are implying?
I also think that makes sense. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
