On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:05 PM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > This agrees with my understanding, too. The i= may have to be an > identity, but nothing says the identity has to be meaningful to anyone > other than the signer.
In which case either the errata doc or the -bis rfc has to introduce a "MAY" for i= being an identity instead of tying the two together and effectively excluding the most common uses to which i= will be put. srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
