On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. I can easily believe that the Errata text needs to be even more clear > about this string. Submissions to improve it are eagerly sought... I hear you. I wish I understood better, so I could contribute more usefully. So the UAID is essentially a sender-created identifier used for whatever purpose a sender wishes. I think I am +1 fine with your errata. But I think from the perspective of almost, "who cares...it's just a random sender-used string." As an ESP, perhaps I would populate it with a client identifier for my own purposes. But I'd be surprised if an ISP actually cared/read the identifier. Al -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
