> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Al Iverson > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:46 PM > To: DKIM IETF WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 4871 > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 1. I can easily believe that the Errata text needs to be even more clear > > about this string. Submissions to improve it are eagerly sought... > > I hear you. I wish I understood better, so I could contribute more > usefully. > > So the UAID is essentially a sender-created identifier used for > whatever purpose a sender wishes. >
Actually, at the risk of sparking even greater flurries of electrons, it is not sender created, it is signer created. Signer does not necessarily have to equal sender for DKIM base. This is one of the reasons I tend to fall into the "d=" camp. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
