On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:14 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually, at the risk of sparking even greater flurries of electrons, it > is not sender created, it is signer created. Makes sense. > Signer does not necessarily > have to equal sender for DKIM base. This is one of the reasons I tend to > fall into the "d=" camp. I don't follow. Al -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
