Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Hector Santos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> DKIM Chair wrote:
>>> Then there's the question of where ADSP stands, and whether it can proceed
>>> as is,
>>> or needs to be changed in light of the "errata". Pasi may have some
>>> comments on
>>> this, and I know the working group will. We've been holding ADSP up for a
>>> while,
>>> and we need to release it and move it forward.
>> +1. This is our own holdup on moving forward with DKIM.
>
> Speaking of ADSP, I am -1 on its continuation. I dont see any
> significant receiver (ISP) adoption of ADSP, to be frank.
Given the state of flux for ADSP, there was no way that our ISP services
would even consider deploying it until after it was published. Now that
it's closer, our ISP services certainly have plans for deployment.
Tony Hansen
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
