On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suresh, notwithstanding what some vendors might wish in terms of > reputation, the case for ADSP is and always has been to leverage DKIM to > be able to say "this domain signs all mail" in one way or another. > > Whether reputation is used in conjunction with this is a different > discussion. From an abused (by phishing) domain perspective, DKIM > signing of all mail + ADSP (being able to make the assertion that all > mail is signed for a particular domain or subdomain)is useful for both > the sender and the receiver. I am not going to claim that it is a magic > bullet. It addresses particular issues in a particular way. +1 It has nothing to do with reputation or reputation granularity. Regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
