On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Hector Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> Most of ADSP has been, so far, an attempt to introduce (sometimes >> ridiculously) fine grained reputation scoring for vendors, and clients >> of vendors. > > Can you explain where in the specification this is stated?
Not the spec. The majority of the use cases I have seen proposed for it, on the other hand .. > I hope the WG chairs will help keep the WG focus of the prize - an IETF > standard policy layer/protocol for DKIM and not allow out of scope > reputation ideas to ruin it once again as it did for SSP the past years. If you call them out of scope where that's going to be their single largest intended application .. well, you are technically right I guess. Practically ... ? That's another question. --srs _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
