On Mar 19, 2009, at 11:22 PM, DKIM Chair wrote: > The chairs appreciate the view that the "errata" draft makes a lot > of changes. > Nevertheless, the view that those changes are too great... is quite > a minority > view. The only concrete objection we've seen in this latest round > is about the > "UAID" term, and that appears to be resolved by making it "AUID". > > Beyond that, I've seen no clear objections and no alternative text > proposed. > Rough consensus appears to be with the "errata" draft, with the > "AUID" change > made to it. So there it is.
There have been suggested changes to the text that was made previously. There did not seem to be a reason to repeat the same objections and proposed changes when there did not appear to be agreement on going forward with portions of the errata that change prior definitions. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
