darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn
darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn darn
definition of AUID is screwed up. didn't mean to change it.
so...
Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 7. RFC4871 Section 2.10 Agent or User Identifier (AUID)
>
> Old:
> A single, opaque value that identifies the agent or user on behalf
> of whom the SDID has taken responsibility.
>
> New:
> A single domain name that identifies the agent or user on behalf
> of whom the SDID has taken responsibility. For DKIM
> processing, the name has only basic domain name semantics; any
> possible owner-specific semantics is outside the scope of DKIM.
New:
A single value that identifies the agent or user on behalf
of whom the SDID has taken responsibility. For DKIM
processing, the domain name portion of the AUID has only basic
domain name semantics; any possible owner-specific semantics is
outside the scope of DKIM.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
