On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 07:59:48PM -0400, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:49:38PM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>>> 6. RFC4871 Section 2.9 Signing Domain Identifier (SDID)
>> ...
>>> New:
>>> A single domain name that is the mandatory payload output of
>>> DKIM and that refers to the identity claiming responsibility for
>>> introduction of a message into the mail stream. For DKIM
>>> processing, the name has only basic domain name semantics; any
>>> possible owner-specific semantics is outside the scope of DKIM.
>>
>> A single domain name -> A single, registered domain name
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 7. RFC4871 Section 2.10 Agent or User Identifier (AUID)
>> ...
>>> New:
>>> A single domain name that identifies the agent or user on behalf
>>> of whom the SDID has taken responsibility. For DKIM
>>> processing, the name has only basic domain name semantics; any
>>> possible owner-specific semantics is outside the scope of DKIM.
>>
>> A single domain name -> A single, syntactically valid domain name
>>
>> {{ no, I'm not in love that that wording choice. /d }}
>>
>>
>> How much indigestion does this cause?
>
> none for me. +1
oh, and +1 for the others
--
Jeff Macdonald
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
