On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, John Levine wrote: >> New: >> A single domain name that identifies the agent or user on behalf >> of whom the SDID has taken responsibility. For DKIM >> processing, the name has only basic domain name semantics; any >> possible owner-specific semantics is outside the scope of DKIM. > > While I'd think it would be dandy if the i= were a domain name, I > suspect I'd be outvoted, so perhaps it would be better to say > something like this: > > A string that identifies the agent or user on behalf of whom > the SDID has taken responsibility. The string has the syntax > of an e-mail address where the domain part is the same as the > SDID or a subdomain of the SDID. For DKIM processing, the AUID > has no semantics beyond validation that it complies with the > syntactic rules; any possible owner-specific semantics is > outside the scope of DKIM.
I'm fine with either form. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
