+1 from me. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > The latest text (both Levine's and mine) move that aspect of the text back > to where it was. > > Again: No change in the definition of AUID (i=) was intended and I am > /very/ sorry for that bit of sloppiness.
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
