SM wrote: > Hi Hector, > At 23:22 26-03-2009, Hector Santos wrote: >> Who is the document addressed to? I must be the only one here that is >> having trouble with the "new" lingo in communications. > > The document is addressed to DKIM implementors. The document can also > be used as a base for extensions built upon DKIM.
Well, before you can have DKIM implementators, they probably have something to first with electronic mail, and at some point it all has to revert back to layman terms (as we know it today) for customers to enjoy. The question I ask to myself is this: Can someone successful implement DKIM using RFC 4871 without having to resort to this errata? Or does errata significant enough in fixing the original functional specifications that makes it mandatory to have? -- Sincerely Hector Santos http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
