Tony Hansen wrote:
> Siegel, Ellen wrote:
>> Sorry for top-posting, but couldn't we sidestep all of the analysis
>> by simply saying that the *syntax* (rather than the *semantics*)
>> matches that of domain names?
>
> When all is said and done, it's the combination of the "selector +
> _domainkey + SDID" that must be a valid domain name whose TXT records
> can be accessed using DNS. This is the *only* name out of all of these
> that MUST be in the DNS.
Has any reader of this spec actually been confused? I sure
haven't seen it, and the advent of zillions of web resources in case
there were any question at all makes this seem like a rather academic
debate.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
